Article written

Why are Ron Paul supporters working so hard to defame Obama? 58

Jan29

Well, this is certainly a popular blog. The ridiculous details outlined here, along with the hilarious article in Globe, lead me to believe that this is all just another amatuer Sinclair Swift Boat attempt. Considering how he has failed not one, but two lie detector tests on the claims, and uh, attempted to hit up YouTube users for cash, the man becomes more and more ridiculous by the minute. Larry is pressing on, of course, with a whole new set of conspiracy theories, but considering the fact that the polygraph was his own challenge, and he failed his own challenge, it’s time to let this rest.

This whole Sinclair thing has made its way around various other right-wing blogs in the blogosphere since the posting of this, and I don’t have the time or interest in tracking them all down. I’m sure there are plenty more Ron Paul supporter and non-Ron Paul supporter blogs posting this story now, since whitehouse.com has offered a $100,000 bounty on the lie detector test.

The point of this blog was to document the web footprint of this story as of the date and time that it was posted. 2008-01-29
12:03:46 am. The results I documented represented all of google’s results at that date and time searching for “larry sinclair”+obama. Every blog that appeared in the results at that time that considered the video credible is linked to here. I’ve excluded blogs like dlisted and other blogs who called Sinclair a “toothless crackhead.” I also excluded message board posts, which are meaningless, since anyone can sign up and post on any message board, though the results did include the Ron Paul forums, and other reliable news sources like the Kumho Tires message board.

I’ve included Cao’s blog here, which was the only blog to register on that google result on that date that wasn’t a self-identified Ron Paul supporter.

Meanwhile, some of the blogs listed below are now beginning to retro-actively withdraw their Ron Paul endorsement as a response to this blog. Why? Because Ron Paul repudiated the 9/11 Truthist kooks, of course. Now that Larry has evidently failed two polygraphs, the question is, were the Ron Paul bloggers who were around at the start of this taken for a ride, too? I suspect so. They were the perfect army to get the ball rolling, then Obama supporters took the bait, and kept it rolling. Then, it blew up to what it became. In the end, it looks like we were all duped into playing along. Though, some of the blogs listed below are now reporting on the results of the polygraph tests with new conspiracy theories involving the credibility of the “expert” who administered it, how it’s more likely for a truthful person to have a false negative, etc. etc. I suppose it will go on forever, so long as people keep playing the game.

_______________________________________________

By now, many of you have seen the laughable claims of this man:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY

READ: Toothless crackhead alert!

“Mr. Sinclair” has given zero proof and absolutely few details about his life to support any sort of credibility.

There appears to be substantial proof, however, that this is originating and/or being perpetuated from the Ron Paul support base

What proof? Do you ask?

Folks, I work in the internet biz, too, and I know how this works. You post this on blogs, message boards, spam craigslist with it, submit it to sites like Digg and Mahalo, and eventually, you have thousands of google search results. What is undeniable, though, is that there is a distinct web footprint evident on the spread of this nonsense.

The first blog to report this “story”, and subsequently, a statement from “Larry Sinclair” was the blog anndavis.blogspot.com. Ron Paul Supporter.

Subsequently, “Larry Sinclair” appeared on the Jeff Rense show. rense.com. A conspiracy theory radio show that lends credence to such stories as “Monica Lewinski was an Israeli Operative, sent to bring down the Clinton White House.” Jeff Rense is a Ron Paul supporter.

The viral nature of the spread of this video, and the subsequent conspiracy theories about mainstream media suppression are trademarks of the extreme Paul supporters, and their “Truthism” cause. See Truthism.com if you have several hours to waste reading complete nonsense, assuming you don’t go blind from the horrific web design.

Note the other blogs in the blogosphere that are lending credibility to these claims:

We Saw That is a Ron Paul supporter.
DailyPaul.com needs no explanation.
The Pirate Bay is a torrent site that appears to have every word Ron Paul has ever said available for download.
RumorMillNews is a Ron Paul supporter.
Know the Lies is a Ron Paul supporter.
Freedom4um is a Ron Paul supporter which links directly to Ron Paul’s Official Site.
St0ckman.blogspot.com is a Ron Paul supporter.
Mrsircy.blogspot.com is a Ron Paul supporter.
Bloh.balder.org which is in Finnish or trekkie or something is a Ron Paul supporter.
Libertypost.org is a Ron Paul supporter.
TheLastDaysBulletin is a Ron Paul supporter.
ThePowerHourNews is a Ron Paul supporter AND fundraiser.
A URL, Gay08.com redirects to the YouTube video. Wisely, the domain was registered with private registration. The first reference to the URL is listed on the GodlikeProductions.com message board by a user named TroyDungeon, who is a Ron Paul supporter:

GodlikeProductions itself is a site full of Ron Paul supporters.

The initial user to post this on Digg, “DeepFriedFetus“, is a Ron Paul supporter.

These are the sites which link to and/or attempt to lend credibility to “Mr. Sinclair’s” ridiculous charges. Every single one of the blogs pushing this video as credible are Ron Paul supporters.

So, I believe the real news story here is: why are Ron Paul’s supporters so invested in this story?

You’re seriously disgracing your candidate. You are, in fact, doing your candidate more harm than good. There are two distinct Ron Paul “campaigns.” There is the official Ron Paul campaign, and there is the Ron Paul internet “campaign.” Go to any city’s Craigslist, and you will be inundated with nonsensical posts that Ron Paul will indeed secure the Republican nomination.

This same Ron Paul unofficial “campaign” has even led trouble to Ron Paul’s doorstep, as this Wired article details. Frankly, this Larry Sinclair nonsense amounts to nothing more than that. Yet another CRIMINAL internet campaign being fueled in mass by Ron Paul supporters.

Now, fuck off.

UPDATE: “Larry” is now directing threats at me for slander lawsuits.

DO NOTE that I am not implicating Ron Paul himself or the Ron Paul campaign in anything. I am simply documenting, through links on these sites, that every site out there that is pressing this issue has identified themselves as Ron Paul supporters. Bring it on, Larry. Bring it on!

UPDATE: Larry states that he will be on the internet radio show “The Right Perspective.” Whether “NewsGuy2005″ is Frank or John (note how every hit for “NewsGuy2005″ lists the url therightperspective.com in its tagline, mostly announcements of shows) is unclear. What is clear is that NewsGuy2005 is the official spokesperson for the show, and that NewsGuy2005 is a Ron Paul supporter.

Newsguy’s post on a discussion on freerepublic.com:


To: All

Neil Cavuto was totally PWN3D by Dr. Paul when FOX News tried to do a “rope-a-dope” on the Texas Congressman:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqPhrqllHzY

Also notice how FOX News brought Dr. Paul on to talk about the effect holiday ads have on the election, then side-swiped him with this question about a lousy $500 donation.

It’s very strange how Dr. Paul barely cracks the two-digits in the polls yet the MainStream Media goes after him with hit pieces like this and the one over at LGF… they must really be scared that Dr. Paul’s message will resonate when the public realizes they don’t have much of a choice between Hitlery/Obumba and the cardboard cutout figure the Republicans will prop up for their nominee.

I absolutely LOVE how Ron Paul handled this obvious hit piece by FOX News… don’t take their lies and deception, Dr. Paul!


125 posted on 12/20/2007 9:58:48 PM PST by NewsGuy2005 (www.therightperspective.com)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

NewsGuy2005′s post on freerepublic.com regarding the Sinclair interview was deleted. Moderator’s note for the thread:

 

This thread has been pulled.
Pulled on 02/01/2008 2:30:48 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:

No thanks to Rense et al.

The Right Perspective has removed the blog posting announcing the show.

Update: Larry “cancelled” the interview last week, after, of course, having to rush to the emergency room or whatever bullshit story he made up, or whatever. Nevermind the fact that he was on YouTube all night.

Anyhow, here is the link to it. Feel free to listen for yourself and see how batshit crazy this fool is. He’s apparently convinced now that David Axelrod and Barack Obama have hired people to make fun of him on YouTube, or whatever. Yes. Anyone who thinks you’re a dipshit, Larry, must be on the payroll. Anyone with half a brain knows you’re a dipshit. I’m on nobody’s fucking payroll. Obviously, you aren’t either.

Anyhow, I wish I could take back the time I wasted listening to that stupid show. On the full show, they began by referring to Obama as “Jungle Boy”. Yeah, real fucking reliable, you mealy-voiced racist kooks! Apparently, they’re skipping right past the Alien conspiracy Ron Paul kooks, and straight to the racist newsletters and radio show Ron Paul kooks. Bravo.

STILL MORE CRAZY UPDATES: Cao insists that he is not a Ron Paul supporter, which somehow would negate the overwhelming Paultard support for this nonsense. I have issued Cao my own Larry Sinclair challenge, and Cao won’t put his money where his mouth is. Just for you, Cao, I’ll clear this up. This is being spread by 99.9% Ron Paul supporters, and one guy with a severe noncommittal mancrush on Ron Paul.

And, even funnier, Larry Sinclair says he filed a civil lawsuit against David Axelrod and the Obama campaign for illegally investigating him and “slandering” him. This, of course is based on some blog and message board posts by some totally random dudes who, uh, signed up for a free account on democrats.org.

  1. larrysinclair0926 Says:
    :shock: I have not ignored any request for facts supporting my claims about obama. I have refused to turn over information to the internet warriors who somehow feel I owe them something. In response to the attempt to call me a liar about the smears on the official DNC site I provide you the following link http://www.democrats.org/page/community/tag/Larry+Sinclair
    I also would like to say that comingawakening is posting videos making claims that he know what day I met Obama, and what day the navy graduation took place only all of his claimed FACTS were totally made up by him and I had to correct him. :oops:

Larry, keep it up. You’re the funniest man on the internets!

YET ANOTHER update:

The Smoking Gun has a copy of the lawsuit on its site: Slanderous Kook: I’m a Slander Victim. It’s a really small world, because I have family in Duluth. I’ve been to Duluth several times. Larry, you live in the crackhead part of town, in the middle of the broken down old factories and train yards. You’re in more danger from just living there than you are due to this nonsense. Next time I’m going to be in Duluth, let me know what corner you’ll be on, and I’ll drop you some change so you can get yourself an order of tots at Taco John’s.

I do have a serious question, Larry. I googled the address listed on the court papers (and you can knock off your posturing toward the Smoking Gun regarding that. You filed the stupid papers, so they are public record). I matched up the address and my question is why do you live in an “elderly and assisted care facility?”

See here

WTF? You live with your grandma???

HUD papers on the Tower

Page 12.

The towers are Section 236 HUD subsidized low- income housing. Occupancy requirements: Elderly and handicapped.

So, uh, exactly what kind of “handicap” are we talking about here? Anyone care to guess?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

subscribe to comments RSS

There are 58 comments for this post

  1. hody says:

    its disgusting what this guy is trying to do.

  2. suck Obama’s cock? because it’s inter-racial or gay?

  3. Gay, dude, gay. It’s totally gay to suck cock(unless, of course, youre a female- then it’s totally cool)

  4. Mark Collins says:

    Ron Paul didn’t link to this. Ron Paul’s supporters did. Why? Ron Paul’s supporters are tired of the Asses and Elephants shitting on the Constitution. Remember that? The highest law in the land? Of course they’re going to take a stab at a prospective future Constitution Shitter. Obama is on the Council for Foreign Relations, just like every other Dem or Rep running except Paul. This is why we’re angry. This is why we link when we find stories exposing the crooks. We’d do it for Hillary, or any other CFR bastard.

    It’s Constitutionalism vs. Corporate Slavery.

  5. Dear Murray says:

    You are confusing the Senate Foreign Relations Committee with your boogeyman CFR, of which Obama is not a member.

    I never said Ron Paul linked to this.

  6. ann D. says:

    I have emailed you and I am also asking you here to please remove the name of my blog from this article. At no point have I ever endorsed Ron Paul, nor have I given any indication (via my blog or otherwise) that I support Ron Paul. Your accusations are false and baseless, and I expect you to remove the name of my blog (anndavis.blogspot.com) from your site IMMEDIATELY. Thank you.

  7. Ron Paul supporter says:

    It is tiresome that the people who want to ignore this story and keep Obama as the "annointed one" keep blaming the story on the Ron Paul supporters. I lived in IL while Obama was in the Senate, and he is as dirty as they come, politically speaking. It wouldn’t surprise me at all if he was also dirty when it comes to drug use, living on the "down low," or who knows what else. Why give Obama some kind of free pass? Character matters – especially when running for the highest office in the USA.

    Expose him for what he really is – because that is what matters. We don’t need another liar in the White House after the biggest liar so far – George W. I thought Sinclair came across very credibly in his radio interview, and I hope this story hits the mainstream media, although I am sure they will try to keep a lid on it, if at all possible, to protect their "annointed one."

  8. Dear Murray says:

    It is tiresome that you’re a fucking nut job, and if it wasn’t for the Ron Paultards, this stupid fucking baseless attempt at a smear campaign would have died a long fucking time ago.

    Much like Ron Paul’s chances.

  9. John Foster says:

    Dear Murray,
    Way to turn a smear against one good guy into a smear of another good guy. Your claims that Ron Paul has anything at all to do with this are baseless. You are a complete hypocrite. Unless you remove this smear page against Ron Paul you are no better than Larry Sinclair. You should be ashamed.

  10. John Foster says:

    I think you are using Ron Paul’s name to attract people to your lame blog.

  11. Dear Murray says:

    this is not a “smear” against ron paul, idiots.

    this is ron paultards spamming more nonsense all over the internet.

  12. Dear Murray says:

    Give me a fucking break.

    Nobody’s looking for Ron Paul except you bunch of internet spammers.

    The reality is this nonsense that is Larry Sinclair is being spammed all over the internet by the faction of Ron Paul’s more, uh, rabid supporters.

  13. Glad you could finally make it here, douchebag.

  14. Qelqoth says:

    Just to let you know that I haven’t removed you from my blogroll…I’ve just moved the blogroll to another part of my site. This is because I wanted extra space in my sidebar to accomodate for the new web forum I installed recently, that’s all.

  15. NewsGuy says:

    Hi, came across your blog post while doing a search on Larry Sinclair.

    I am the producer of The Right Perspective and I want to state that, for the record, The Right Perspective has never endorsed Ron Paul’s campaign. The hosts of the show, Frank from Queens and John of Staten Island, supported Rudy Giuliani’s campaign, mainly because we’re a NYC-based show and we saw first-hand how Rudy turned NYCNY around 180 degrees from a disaster area (under the Dinkins administration) into one of the safest and best cities in the world. Now that Rudy is out of the game, Frank and John have said they may sit out the election this year (McCain is hawkish but no conservative).

    Larry Sinclair canceled the interview last week due to "health reasons" (he claimed to have been calling from a hospital E/R when canceling) but will be on this Friday (Feb. 8) at 10:30 pm.

    your comment was edited: You can voice your opinion on my blog, but no blatant advertising. Love, Murray.

  16. NewsGuy says:

    Your blog converted the interview date into a smiley.

    The interview will be on Friday, Feb. 8th at 10:30pm.

    You can call in with your questions/comments at 718-761-9996.

  17. Dear Murray says:

    haha. right. meanwhile, he was on youtube all night, arguing with everyone.

    he supposedly has cancer, and in his new videos, he’s smoking cigarettes. real fucking brilliant.

    and you’re an idiot for buying his bullshit, Peter. Then again, you support Ron Paul, so I expect nothing less.

  18. lo says:

    I agree with this article, and if you want to believe Mr. Sinclair… then that’s your thing. I’m too smart to trust him. If you want to handle things legally, youtube isn’t the way to do it. It’s not professional, and shows that he’s just trying to make some noise directed to Obama. Good try! Please go back on your spaceship. This article was not accusing Dr. Ron Paul, he was accusing the fanatic Ron Paul supporters… and I have seen the amount of spam they do on Obama!

  19. Dear Murray says:

    Jesus Christ, your racist show sucks. Who the fuck are these dipshits?

    “Obama the jungle boy?”

    You Ron Paultards need to climb back onto the mothership .

  20. NewsGuy says:

    Murray, The Right Perspective has never endorsed or supported Ron Paul. Nice try, though.

  21. Dear Murray says:

    Uh, YOU as the SPOKESPERSON for the Racist Perspective have endorsed Ron Paul, Peter. See your OWN WORDS ABOVE, with the tagline for the right perspective attached to it. You might want to watch yourself in the future being a spokesperson for the show on ideas they don’t support.

    Keep trying, dumbass. Keep trying.

  22. Cao says:

    It would be even funnier if Obama would come out and say that it’s foolishness. His silence is adding to the rumor mill.

    Of course attacking the messenger is just another way of taking the focus off of Obama’s strange aversion to mentioning this anywhere, and the media’s avoidance.

    It’s a hard thing to prove slander when you’re talking about a public figure. It’s easy to prove when it’s a private citizen.

    Think about it…

  23. ak says:

    The right perspective celebrates "White Pride" month.
    http://therightperspectivepodcastblog.blogspot.com/2006/01/real-haters.html#links

    Ron Paul is known to be supported by white supremacists. Just search stormfront for ron paul

  24. Obama supporter says:

    YOu know all these commits about this man and no one knowns the truth, but yet one man come alone who looks as crazy as a bat say a few things that can bring a person down and small minded people starts to believe him. I was said years ago before you send a person to the eletric chair first get the facts, because when that person is put to death it on your head and the guilt willl follow you to hell.

  25. Tfitz says:

    What is my country becoming?

  26. Bob says:

    Is it truly possible to defame those who have already been emminently successful in defaming themselves? One does not have to be an RP supporter to see the handwriting on the walls that Obama, flatly in spite o his alleged "Islamic" schooling, will, upon entering the White House, become just another lap dog for AIPAC and Israel and in that capacity do yet further irreparable damage to a nation that is on life support anyway.

  27. Dear Murray says:

    Because there is nothing to address, dipshit. Just a small group of worthless idiots posting it on their precious blogs and claiming “OMG! CONSPIRACIEEEES! CONSPIRACIEEEES!”

  28. Dear Murray says:

    Learn to read, dipshit.

    You do know that the only religious school the man attended was a CATHOLIC school, right?

    Do not breed. Get yourself sterilized at once.

    The gene pool cannot afford you.

  29. J.A.McCoy says:

    Here is my suggestion to this bogus smear type and to all others…… we need to adopt/devise the best defense of this type of attack… the "I AM SPARTACUS" defense……..seriously.

    All supporters need to FLOOD YouTube, etc, w/ bogus claims of gay drugs and sex… not only does this dilute the original bogus claim and confuse the general political consumer, it drowns out all future sincere claims of scandal and will probably produce some funny results like this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_wRb8J_bjM

    hmmmmm….. looks like iamlarrysinclair.com is available…. any takers?

  30. Dear Murray says:

    I DO believe Buster McDermott, though! He’s telling the trooof!

  31. supervoter says:

    The Ron Paul people are scared of the thought of having a black president. I wouldn’t expect anything less from members of the KKK. They have nothing on Obama so are trying to fabricate stories. The Paultards need to go back to their compounds in Montana and play with their guns.

    Read Ron Paul’s own website and tell me he is not the definition of RACIST. There is a mountain of evidence that points to his link to the KKK. Look at any KKK or David Duke related website. They ALL endorse Ron Paul. Shocking!

    http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/racism...

    http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/11/...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CywY2581U...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5isJiavJX...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCLfJCqIE...

    http://www.mediamouse.org/features/07200...

    http://phenry.dailykos.com/

    On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amen
    04/25/2007
    House Roll Call No. 259
    110th Congress, 1st Session

    Passed: 425-1 (see complete tally)

    H. Con. Res. 7, amended, to call on the League of Arab States to acknowledge the genocide in the Darfur region of Sudan and to step up their efforts to stop the genocide in Darfur, by a \2/3\ yea-and-nay vote of 425 yeas to 1 nay, Roll No. 259

    Your beloved Ron Paul voted nay. You think he is a good guy? Think again.

    I got this source from http://www.congress.org.

    I could go on and on, but I do not think it is necessary. Too bad Ron Paul supports cannot use facts to debate about their candidate and the competition!

  32. Larry Sinclair lives in South Texas, not Duluth, MN. Sinclair himself gives the clues to this in his YouTube videos where he has a "Everything’s bigger in Texas" shirt, in a room with a Mexican Flag, talking with a Texas drawl, and with a freaking fan running , which means it’s warm, and he’s a Ron Paul supporter. So this guy’s an obvious faker!

    See:

    http://zennie2005.blogspot.com/2008/02/larry-sinclair-is-texan-obama-hater.html

  33. Larry Sinclair lives in South Texas, not Duluth, MN. Sinclair himself gives the clues to this in his YouTube videos where he has a "Everything’s bigger in Texas" shirt, in a room with a Mexican Flag, talking with a Texas drawl, and with a freaking fan running , which means it’s warm, and he’s a Ron Paul supporter. So this guy’s an obvious faker!

    See:

    http://zennie2005.blogspot.com/2008/02/larry-sinclair-is-texan-obama-hater.html

  34. Vonnie says:

    Even if Obama got his cock sucked, he is still a better dem choice than Clinton. The Clintons have scorned women and dead bodies in their past. They are no good!

  35. Goody says:

    Why doesn’t Obama address the issue, put it to rest? BECAUSE he wants to make sure the nomination is tied up first.

  36. Dear Murray says:

    Because responding to that slanderous nut case would be giving him more attention than he deserves.

  37. Peter S. says:

    As an Obama supporter, I am ashamed and emberassed that this blog exists. Although I don’t agree with all of the policies, Ron Paul’s supporters tend to be very intelligent and educated, much more so than Hillary/McCain voters for example, and very similar to Obama supporters.

    Insulting paul supporters by calling them names just reflects poorly on your own intelligence level.

  38. [...] Man to take polygraph to answer claims that he had gay sex, did cocaine with Sena The Ron Paul geniuses are the ones pushing hard to the hoop on this… I guess that’s why I haven’t heard of it… [...]

  39. Buster says:

    I don’t appreciate y’alls ignoring my allegations against Mr. Ron Paul, who invited me to have a lemon party with his ibex. I demand that this issue be addressed!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_wRb8J_bjM

  40. geminess says:

    Why in the hell should Obama reply to these outrageous allegations?? The burden of proof is on the ACCUSER!!! Obama need only sit back and watch others pull this guy’s story to shreds. If this guy has SUBSTANTIVE and DEFINITIVE proof…like a "blue dress"…lol… then maybe Obama has some " ‘splainin’ to do". Until then..that bogus lie detecter test will not cut. NOR will reciepts from 10 years ago or anything else that van be MANIPULATED in the accuser’s favor. Hearsay and bullshit reciepts are not enogh.

  41. geminess says:

    Another thing…FOLLOW THE MONEY!! WHO is supplying the $10,000 for this guy to TAKE the lie detector test and an additional $100,000 if he passes? WHO would try this "poor man’s swiftboating" of an honorable and competent candidate?? I don’t think its Hillary…she would have used a more classier character. MCCain is too busy trying to act like Obama is "the Invisible Man". Who are the backers of this farce?? Follow the money….

  42. PatriotNews says:

    I think Larry Sinclair is telling the truth. I mean come on, listen to what he is saying and it just has the aire of truth about it. He doesn’t sound like he’s lying. And liers usually mess up the lies. They change their stories. This guy hasn’t contradicted himself once. Liars ussually make up their lies as they go along, so when asked the name of the club he met Obama he just said I’m 90% sure I know but I’m not going to say until I check my credit card records. What will you say when he provides those records? Will you say you were wrong and Larry is telling the truth? I doubt it. Where is the proof this guy was a mental patient? I’m not a Ron Paul supporter, I voted for Romney. I like Ron Paul, he’s a little kookie. I support the war. Now I’d rather have McCain than anyone in the socialist party.

  43. Brian says:

    Thank you for the work you’ve done on this story, and for clearing up some of this horrible smearing. Thank for fighting back against these low lifes. It’s appreciated.

  44. Cris says:

    So he has receipts? That should clear everything up right? Just because a liar doesn’t mess up his lies but only talks around them doesn’t mean he is not lying, it just means he has had a long time to get his story together and he still doesn’t have it right. And if he has receipts then they will show exact dates right? He can’t even provide an exact date. WTH is between Nov. 3 and Nov. 8th????? Did he get that high?

  45. matteblack says:

    I have started a debunking wikipedia page, because if I didn’t, some GOP or Paultard would have noticed there wasn’t one, and beaten me to it (pre-emptive warfare?)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Sinclair

    This ridiculous story is getting more and more traction by the minute. There is some astroturf group calling C-Span’s Washington Journal almost ever day, and more and more comments are appearing on the big media sites. His YouTube smear is approaching 400,000 views. TheSmokingGun.com now has his "lawsuit," and the gossip site, bigHeadDC is pumping it up routinely.

    On the 26th, this clown takes his lie detector test, according to his sponsor, Whitehouse.com (paid him $10,000 to take the test), and I am afraid the story breaks out when that happens, even though the results will probably be completely bogus.

  46. PC says:

    He takes the polygraph on Tuesday and it will most likely be over. Larry will have pissed off a lot of people. Obama will get a lot of sympathy for this. If it is real, which is not likely, Obama’s crazy supporters will still go after him. You can’t be against hope and change and audacity and whatever else he is for, doesn’t really ring a bell at the the moment, but you can’t be against all that stuff. Of course there was McGreevey and Craig and the page guy and the catholic church and Haggard so anything is possible. The site is also challenging McCain’s mistress to take a lie detector so there is a bright side.

  47. dom youngross says:

    "The Ron Paul people are scared of the thought of having a black president."

    I am a Ron Paul supporter. I became a Republican only to support Paul.

    If Paul wasn’t around but Barack Obama stood for the same things Paul does, constitutionally-appropriate federal government activities, I would have become a Democrat to support Obama.

    It’s always the same story. The ones who jump to blanket accuse others of racism, or are the first to notice skin color, are the real racists.

Please, feel free to post your own comment

* these are required fields

Dear Murray is powered by WordPress.